Free association
Freud's one rule: say whatever comes to mind, especially what seems irrelevant or embarrassing. You can try a version of it on paper.
Key takeaways
- Freud's basic rule was to say everything that comes to mind, without leaving out what seems unimportant, rude or silly.
- There's little evidence that it uncovers hidden truths the way Freud thought. A cousin of it, writing freely about what troubles you, has modest benefits in trials.
- The useful part is often what you skip past: the swerve, the thought you nearly left out, the thing that surprised you.
The talking cure
In the early 1880s, the Viennese physician Josef Breuer treated a young woman known in the case notes as Anna O. She found that talking through whatever was on her mind, at length, eased her symptoms. She called it "the talking cure".
Breuer's younger colleague Sigmund Freud took the idea further. At first he used hypnosis, then pressed his hand on patients' foreheads and insisted a memory would come. Over the 1890s he gave both up for something simpler: the patient lay down, and said whatever came to mind.
The one rule
Freud called it the fundamental rule. Say everything, he told patients, even when a thought seems unimportant, irrelevant, embarrassing or rude. He compared it to sitting by the window on a train and describing the passing view to someone who can't see it: you report what goes by, you don't choose it.
The rule matters because of what we normally do. In ordinary talk, and in ordinary thinking, we edit constantly: we stay on topic, skip what's awkward and drop what seems pointless. Freud thought the edits were where the interesting material was. The thought you were about to leave out is often the one that matters.
Halfway through writing about her week, Amira thinks of her old piano teacher, which seems to have nothing to do with anything. Following Freud's rule, what should she do?
What the evidence says
Freud believed free association led, step by step, to buried memories and wishes. There's little good evidence for that, and it's easy for a listener to read whatever they expect into what comes out.
A close cousin has been tested, though. In the 1980s, the psychologist James Pennebaker asked students to write for about 15 minutes a day, over a few days, about their deepest thoughts and feelings on something that troubled them. Over the following months they visited the health center less than students who wrote about everyday topics. Many studies since have found small benefits from this kind of expressive writing, not large ones.
One warning. If the writing just goes round the same worries, it's turned into rumination. Stop, and do something else.
Try it on paper
Ten minutes
- Start anywhere
With what's on your mind, or with "Right now I'm thinking about…".
- Don't stop
Keep the pen moving for ten minutes. Don't correct, don't stay on topic, don't make it make sense.
- Keep the edits in
Especially the thoughts you're tempted to leave out because they seem silly, rude or beside the point.
- Read it back
Where did it swerve? What surprised you? What did you hurry past? Notice, without needing to explain it.
Sources and further reading
- Freud, S. (1913). On beginning the treatment (Further recommendations on the technique of psycho-analysis I). Standard Edition, Vol. 12.
- Pennebaker, J. W., & Beall, S. K. (1986). Confronting a traumatic event: Toward an understanding of inhibition and disease. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95(3), 274-281.
- Frattaroli, J. (2006). Experimental disclosure and its moderators: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132(6), 823-865.
Finish the lesson
Answer the question above to complete the lesson.